The Entitlement Mentality of the Right

While watching YouTube recently, I came across a video by James Yeager, a brilliant military and personal defense tactician who is socially deeply misguided, in which he demonstrates which amateur radio transceivers he owns and how he carries them. Apparently, at least based on the stream of comments to the video, he does not have an amateur radio license.

Sorry I couldn't find any targets with "UN" printed on them.
Sorry I couldn’t find any targets with “UN” printed on them.

Some of us in the amateur radio community who saw the video chimed in that he needed to get his license, and we were all immediately set upon by a cacophony of ugly protests. It’s safe to say, based on my experience, that the vast majority of Yeager’s following is right wing NRA-types. Here are but a few shining examples…

  1. “Guess what? I transmitted on a ham radio and nothing happened.”
  2. “I’ve listened to ham radio and it’s pretty worthless.”
  3. “In a SHTF/WROL scenario, who cares about a license?”

1. First, claiming that if a consequence didn’t happen once, it won’t happen again is the way teenagers think. Guess what? I drove drunk and nothing happened. I flew an airplane without a license and nothing happened. I fucked a Haitian whore and nothing happened.

2. If you think something regulated by the government is “worthless” or you otherwise don’t like it, you can do with it as you please?

3. The good news is that the end-of-the-world (SHTF/WROL = Shit Hits the Fan/Without Rule of Law) these preppers are so eager to see is never going to happen, so in reality, their ham radios will be doing the same thing as their tactical vests and canned food: nothing.

So what is the bottom line for them, then? Entitlement. If they want something, they should have it, whether they have earned it or not.

Your argument is as full of holes as this piece of metal, which is full of, well, a lot of holes.
Your argument is as full of holes as this piece of metal, which is full of, well, a lot of holes.
0
Share on FacebookEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on TumblrPin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

2 Comments

  1. “The good news is that the end-of-the-world … these preppers are so eager to see is never going to happen…”

    I would suggest that it *might* happen, but not the way they envision. First, they or someone like them will likely be the cause of it. Second, it won’t be as pretty as they’d like; a lot of people will go hungry and diseased, and many would die. Third, it won’t last very long — either the previous government would regain control but with much stiffer certainty and without previous personal freedoms, or some other entity will rise to power, and still without previous personal freedoms.

    Also, while I’m not a fan of wanton government intrusion, I’m aware that there are *usually* valid reasons for such regulation and requirements.

    0
  2. The SHTF/WROL they wish for is all about either:

    -The people rising up against the oppression of the liberals, or

    -The economy melting down “right after the next election.”

    They’ve been promising both since I have been alive. One of the oddest element of this thinking is that these same scenarios were promised during the Reagan administration, but the same people now regard Reagan and his government as the greatest in the history of ‘Murica.

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *